All posts by Keith Plant

Letters to the Seven Churches: A Church with an Opportunity: Revelation 3:7-13.

“I know your works. Behold, I have set before you an open door, which no one is able to shut. I know that you have but little power, and yet you have kept my word and have not denied my name” (Revelation 3:8).

There was something gratifying when Leicester City won the Premier League a few years ago.  Here was a football club whose entire squad did not amount to anywhere near the price that is usually paid for a top player in a transfer deal.  Yet, completely unexpectedly, they managed what seemed unattainable.  One can only surmise that it was done through hard work and a considerable self- belief.  The little Church at Philadelphia was going to achieve something incredible to!  However, this was not going to be through their own efforts, but rather, by what Christ was going to do for them.

In verse 8 Jesus promises great opportunities for them with the phrase: ‘I have set before you an open door, which no one is able to shut.’  What makes this so significant is that if you’d been visiting Philadelphia the Church was highly unlikely to be listed in the guidebook.  This was a small and weak looking Church which would have seemed insignificant!  But it was a faithful Church as this is the only other Church, alongside Smyrna which Christ finds no fault with![1]

The phrase: ‘I have set before you an open door’ is not dissimilar to two other similar passages which are found in Acts 14:27 and Colossians 4:3.  In both cases, it is used to illustrate there would be great opportunities for the Gospel.  But, how were these opportunities going to come about for a Church which lacked a voice in its community, and would generally have been dismissed as irrelevant? Strangely enough, the answer is most likely to be found in the opposition they were facing.  Verse 9 refers to Jewish opposition, with the use of the phrase: ‘synagogue of Satan’. Remarkably, however, Jesus claims: ‘I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you’ (v9).  As remarkable as it might seem, this opportunity meant the conversion of many who were previously giving the Church a really hard time!

If the language seems harsh, it is for good reason.  Although it does not play well with people today, there is only one way to God, and that is through Jesus Christ alone (as stated in Acts 4:12): “salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which they must be saved.” Jesus himself also said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6).  The Church in Philadelphia had believed this, and stood faithfully by this truth, as a result of which they were going to see others turned to Christ!

But persecution was coming.  The phrase: ‘the whole world’ in verse 10 almost certainly refers to the Roman world which they were part of.  Yet, once again Christ was going to protect them, and the persecution would be limited.  But there was also blessing to be gained.  The rather odd phrase: ‘a pillar in the temple of my God’ (v12) is a picture of permanence and security.  Jesus is almost certainly using the history of Philadelphia in this rather strange illustration.  In AD 17 there had been a major earthquake and ever since many people had been reluctant to move back into the city.  So those who lived in Philadelphia would have lived in the state of insecurity – hence this emphasis on permanence.  In the end, whatever their apparent smallness and weakness as a Church, they were secure in Christ.  Verse 13 illustrates they were to take these promises to heart and live in the light of them, as their security was in the sovereign Christ: ‘the living one’ (1:18). For us, in our ever-changing world, we too can find the same security in Christ.

Like to listen to a sermon on this passage? A Church that has an Opportunity.

[1] This is probably why the phrase: ‘key of David’ is used in verse 7.  The phrase occurs in Isaiah 22:22 where the faithful Eliakim displaces an unworthy official and is given by the Lord authority to open and shut just as Christ has here.  Michael Wilcock, The Message of Revelation, I saw Heaven Opened (Leicester, Inter-Varsity Press, 1989), 55.

Sufficient, not Luxurious, Grace! 2 Kings 4:1-7.

When I was in my late teens I attended a job interview for a TV rental firm. The interviewer was quite aggressive and plied me with all kinds of questions.  I don’t know quite what he expected, as by the time we were about 10 minutes into the interview I was convinced I didn’t want the job and no doubt he was convinced he didn’t want to give me the job!  However, one particular question has stuck in my mind.  What were my expectations of working for him?  I’m not sure he’d have appreciated me saying: “well I expect in six months I’ll have your job.”  On the other hand, I don’t think he would of have been impressed if I’d said: “well if I end the month with a few bucks in my pocket I’ll be happy.”  But it raises the question of what our expectations in life are, and in particularly, what they are in our Christian life.  You see I believe, a bit like my imaginary answers at my job interview, there are two extremes.  Some expect the Christian life to be a continual experience of near miraculous blessing!  On the other hand, some are happy to experience whatever blessing God gives them, whereas others would say such an approach lacks faith!  So what’s the right answer?  Although there are other examples in the life of the prophet Elisha, this particular episode is one that can help us understand how God might choose to work or what we might expect.

At this point in Elisha’s career as a prophet things are going pretty well. Firstly he’s recognised as Elijah’s successor.  People can see: “The spirit of Elijah” rests on him (2 Kings 2:15).  Secondly the Lord’s worked some amazing miracles through him.  So it makes sense that the widow of one of the: ‘sons of the prophets’ approaches him due to her desperate situation, and desperate it is!  The creditor was at her door and seems to be a pretty heartless individual!  Okay, he’s within his rights (see Exodus 21:1-11, Leviticus 25:39-41 and Deuteronomy 15:1-11) but without her sons and no social security she’s in a desperate state both now and then later in her old age.  So she approaches Elisha, for help as he clearly knew her husband and his godly character.

But this raises a question. Why is the Lord letting it happen to the family of someone who was such a faithful servant in his cause?  It’s the old chestnut, why do bad things happen to good people?  But this proves that Christians are not spared from being caught in the crossfire of living in a fallen world!  There are many examples of the Lord’s people suffering in Scripture!  Jesus himself told his disciples: “In the world you will have tribulation” (John 16:33).  God’s people suffer and this is just another example to help us be realistic about the subject, but also to ultimately encourage us!  So how can it encourage us and help us when life, to put it bluntly, can sometimes seem to be unfair!

Well firstly we can learn a lot from the attitude of the widow. She’s desperate, but, as Dale Ralph Davis highlights: ‘hers is a faithful desperation.’[1]  How can we tell that?  Because, by approaching his prophet, she cries to the Lord for help.  In other words she seeks a word from the Lord, which, in its modern context means turning to Scripture!  If we want to hear the Lord speak, that’s where we should look first.  The Bible’s called God’s Word for a reason, he speaks through it!  The rather encouraging thing for her is Elijah’s response.  He is immediately concerned and seeks to be compliant in helping her as he recognises genuine faith that seeks an answer from the Lord!  We might think: “well he’s a prophet, isn’t he supposed to go around helping people and being compliant with their requests?”  Yet we only have to look back at 3:13 where the godless King Jehoram, who was living up to his parents Ahab and Jezebel’s legacy, is basically told by Elisha: “why should I talk to you, if you want help in this situation why don’t you go to those prophets your father and mother used to employ” (the prophets on Baal in his mother’s case or false prophets in his father’s case).  Elisha’s attitude is different here because this is genuine faith as opposed to the: “can you get us out of a tricky situation that we’ve got into because we haven’t consulted the Lord” attitude of King Jehoram!

This being the case, we might expect to see, in the light of Elisha’s ministry, an impressive miracle. So verse 2 comes as a bit of a surprise as Elisha asks her what she’s got around the house.  Her reply doesn’t seem to hold a lot of promise as all she’s got is: “a jar of oil” demonstrating her poverty!  Elisha seems completely unfazed by this and instructs her to go to her neighbours and get as many jars and utensils as possible (v3).  Jesus himself acted in the same way when he fed the 5000.  When his disciples come to him with a question as to how they were going to deal with the crowd. After throwing the question back at them he then asks them how much food they’ve got (Mark 6:38), that being the prelude to an amazing miracle!  But that’s often the way the Lord’s deals with us.  You may be praying for family or friends to come to know Christ.  Well who’s the best person to invite them to an evangelistic event at your Church?  It’s you!  By all means pray, after all, we’re dependent on Lord, but the answer is you’re the Lord’s instrument in that time and place!  Sometimes, even when we don’t think we got many skills to use in the Lord Service there may be a good number of ‘jars of oil’ that are available, but not being used!  Just as Elisha starts with what the widow has, the Lord often starts with the most basic gifts we possess and uses them for his service!  I’m sure the widow could have thought that that jar of oil was completely insignificant and hardly worth mentioning, but she trusted Elisha and he was able to use it in a remarkable way to solve her problems.

The widow, obeying Elisha’s instructions, shuts herself in her house, just as Elisha has told her to. She then carries out his instruction concerning her jar of oil which is to: “pour into all these vessels. And when one is full, set it aside” (v4).  After all the vessels are full she asks her son to bring another vessel, but he replies that all have been used.  At this point the passage makes it clear that then, and only then, is the oil used up (vs4-6)!  Some commentators suggest that the Lord’s blessing was limited by lack of faith in not getting more utensils.  However, this seems to be based on conjecture of what isn’t there!  It assumes there were more utensils around the village or town, but there seems no indication that she didn’t follow the Prophet’s instructions to the letter.  Indeed, when she reports back to Elisha he simply gives the instruction to: “Go, sell the oil and pay your debts, and you and your sons can live on the rest” (v7).  It appears that he sees the mission as accomplished![2]  The point seems to be that the Lord has sufficiently provided.  But let us note it is sufficiently, not luxuriously!

So how should we understand this? Is there any evidence that she could have experienced a great deal more blessing if she’d only had more faith?  I’m in the camp that says no there isn’t and I’d go even further and say that to pursue such thinking misses some very important points concerning this woman’s faith and the wonderful miracle that the Lord brought about through Elisha!  Firstly, the Word of the Lord is always enough!  Now if we grasp that, it makes a major difference to us as Christians.  Very sadly there is teaching around that suggests that the Lord always works through the miraculous supernatural works and if those things aren’t happening in your Christian life then you’re missing out as you lack the sufficient faith to experience them.  Some Christians become dependent on this kind of experience.  So what happens when there’s an absence of such an experience?  Having counselled such people I find often depression and doubts set in as they don’t have the foundation, which incidentally, the Holy Spirit provides.  The Bible is a book inspired by the Holy Spirit, therefore, it is logical to draw the conclusion that he speaks through it!  In that sense it’s his greatest work!  In Hebrews 4:12 writer describes the nature and action of God’s Word in this way: ‘For the word of God is living and active, sharper than a two-edged sword, piercing the division of the soul and of the spirit, of joint and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.’ A sword like that slices and penetrates the human body!  Likewise God’s Word cannot be stopped from going anywhere or exposing anything, it’s that powerful!  But then we get a key phrase in the next verse: ‘And no creature is hidden from his sight, but all are naked and exposed to the eyes of him to whom we must give an account’ (v13).  Rendered in the original Greek this phrase contains a wrestling term which means to force ones opponents head back or throwing one’s opponent down and proving one’s dominance.[3]  This is if describing literally coming face-to-face with God in his Word each time we open the Bible. The Word of the Lord was sufficient for this widow and her two sons.  She could have said: “that’s the most ludicrous suggestion I’ve ever heard” in relation to Elisha’s remedy for her problems.  But she recognised this was the Word of the Lord and she took it seriously!  The question is do we?  Do we see the Bible as God’s Word and therefore sufficient for each situation we find ourselves in?  If we do we will never have an ordinary or routine Bible study again!

Secondly, God’s grace is always sufficient. The widow was able to pay off her debts.  I stress again this could be termed adequate or sufficient blessing, no more, no less!  But that can often be the way the Lord blesses.  In 2 Corinthians we find Paul under attack from false teachers who liked to give themselves the title of ‘Super apostles’.  One criticism was he wasn’t very impressive as a speaker.   Another (which turns out to be wrong) was he never had extraordinary revelations from the Lord.  Paul defends his ministry, incidentally commenting on an extraordinary revelation that he had experienced, but then refers to what is referred to as ‘Paul’s thorn’.  What exactly he’s describing in 2 Corinthians 12:7 is not clear.  Some think it was a physical problem or a temptation of some sort.  Paul prayed it would be taken away but received this answer from the Lord. “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness” (2 Corinthians 12:8).  And do you know what?  He was content with that answer!  It was enough to know God’s grace kept him going.  He didn’t have the luxury of having the problem taken away, rather he experienced the grace and blessing of being able to continue in the work of the Gospel despite it.  That’s sufficient blessing!  There’s no indication the widow and her sons became rich through this miracle, but they were definitely provided for!

Lastly, God often works in miraculous ways which remain practically invisible. How many people do you think realised a miracle had taken place?  The neighbours probably had an-inkling something was going on, but the miracle unfolded behind closed doors so it’s likely only Elisha, the widow and her sons had any indication something miraculous had happened.  So what we need to ask is do we recognise this kind of thing as a blessing?  We must never neglect to thank God when we see sufficient blessing and grace in our lives or as a Church.  I think there’s a real danger that we can forget to thank God for his sufficient blessing and grace day-to-day.  We often make the mistake of the assuming the Lord owes us as Christians or Churches.  But to quote the verse that I partially quoted earlier Jesus, responding to the worried disciples in the upper room said: “I have said these things to you, that in me may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation.  But take heart; I have overcome the world” (John 16:33).  As that comes from the lips of Jesus we would do well to see it as summing up the Christian experience.  Sometimes the Lord chooses to bless us well beyond what is normal.  But let’s not forget to thank him for his amazing and sufficient day-to-day blessing!

Would you like to hear a sermon on this passage? Sufficient, not Luxurious, Grace! 2 Kings 4:1-7.

[1] Dale Ralph Davis, 2 Kings, The Power and the Fury, (Fearn, Christian Focus Publications, 2005), 55.

[2]Elisha had no problems pointing out that his instructions have not been followed to the letter as we see later in 2 Kings 13:19 where King Jehoash does not show sufficient faith in his excursion of Elisha’s instructions!

[3] Paul Ellingworth, The Epistle to the Hebrews, The New International Greek Testament Commentary, (Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1993), 264.

The Letters to the Seven Churches: A Church that’s all Style, but no Substance! Revelation 3:1-6

“And to the angel of the church in Sardis write: ‘The words of him who has the seven spirits of God and the seven stars.  I know your works. You have the reputation of being alive, but you are dead. Wake up, and strengthen what remains and is about to die, for I have not found your works complete in the sight of my God” (Revelation 3:1-2).

The danger of projecting an image is people seeing through it and finding out one’s not living up to it.  When Jonathan Aitkin brought his case for liable against a newspaper and Television program his defence was he would depend on: ‘the simple sword of truth and the trusty shield of British fair play.’[1]  However he’d lied and he was found guilty of perjury.  He lost his marriage, his fortune and his freedom.  There’s a happy ending as he eventually found peace and fulfilment in Christ.  But imagine how the Church at Sardis felt when Jesus basically says to them: “I’ve found you out!”

Visibly Sardis was probably a large lively Church.  No doubt the equivalent Church today would have the latest technology, a lively worship band and a charismatic Pastor, who, as their website says, gives ‘inspirational and empowering messages!’  But the problem was Christ had seen through them (v1).  The truth hurts at the best of times, but to be told: “you are dead” must be a devastating blow!

So what was wrong?  We cannot be sure, but we have some clues.  Firstly, although Sardis had a temple dedicated to the goddess Artemis, making it was as pagan as any city in Asia Minor, there’s no mention of any opposition!  Persecution is a notable feature, in these letters to the Churches.  Could it be their ‘inspirational’ Pastor, served up feel good messages that didn’t challenge anyone?  The second clue is found in the introduction of the letter which refers to: ‘the seven Spirits of God’ (v1, see Isaiah 11:2).  The Holy Spirit is essential in the preaching of God’s Word for a Church to have life, so it’s not stretching logic too far to suggest the Church was spiritually dead![2]  However empowering their Pastor’s messages appeared to be, they were the words of man, not God!

So Jesus urges them to: ‘Wake up’ and remember their first experience of the Gospel (v3).  They had received new life in Christ, but now they were killing any chance of spiritual growth!  Being on the side of a hill, Sardis was virtually impregnable from three sides.  The road leading into the city was well fortified.  Yet twice in its history the city had been caught unprepared and was conquered by stealth.[3]  The Church was so oblivious to their situation Jesus was going to come against them: ‘like a thief’ (v3) and catch them completely unawares which sounds ominous for the future of the Church.  But as before, Jesus has a promise for the faithful.  The phrase: ‘in white’ (v4) represents the holiness that Christ will give to those who have not ‘soiled their garments.’  What’s wonderful is that others in the Church could join them (v5).  The second part of the verse does not suggest that believers can fall away.  We have lost the idea of this today, but the Bible is often written in corporate terms referring as it does to the ‘people of God’.  So this does not mean individuals will be excluded from: ‘the book of life’ but that the future of the Church was on distinctly dodgy ground (v3).

Once again the passage ends with: ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the Churches’ (v7).  This is surely a warning to a Church in any day and age to take a hard look at itself and to assess whether its works are: ‘complete’ (v2) in the eyes of Christ, because what role can we possibly serve if he finds us lacking where the work of the Holy Spirit is concerned?

Would like to listen to a sermon on this passage? A Church that’s all Style but no Substance!

[1]  Michael White, Political Editor, The Guardian, Tuesday 11 April 1995
[2] Steve Wilmshurst, The Final Word, The Book of Revelation simply explained (Darlington, Evangelical Press, 2008) 51.
[3] Leon Morris, Revelation (Leicester, Inter-Varsity Press, 1969) 75.

Prophet on the Run: A Successful but very Bitter Prophet! Jonah 3-4.

We ended chapter 2 with the fish vomiting Jonah on to dry land, probably to the relief of both of them! From there the story is relatively simple as we saw in the last post.  Jonah is given a second chance to go to Nineveh and preach the message that God has given him.  This he does with very unexpected results when the Ninevites repent.  The book ends with Jonah being an exceptionally angry prophet who resents God forgiving the Ninevites.   But now I want to focus on two things, one fairly briefly as it relates to the time spent inside the fish and the second in a bit more detail as it relates to his prayer in chapter 2.

Any time that Jesus mentions someone by name from the Old Testament we should always take note, and he does this twice concerning Jonah. In Matthew 12:38-40[1] he makes a reference to the three days and three nights Jonah spent in the fish.  Jesus compares this to his dying and resurrection three days later.  But what are we to understand from this?  Firstly, although some commentators make a case for Jonah dying and being resurrected I see no evidence for this.  Jonah compares his plight as being similar to dying, but that’s as far as he goes.  But there’s a sense that Jonah is suffering the Lord’s judgement but is not abandoned to the grave which is what he feared.  This has major parallels with Christ as the apostle Peter points out on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:27 quoting Psalm 16:10).  This illustration is the sign Jesus gives to the unbelieving spiritual leaders of Israel.  The second (which I believe was another occasion) is in Luke 11:29-30 and seems to be aimed at those in the crowd who wanted to see Jesus perform a miracle.  Jesus infers that he’s going to be a sign to that generation just as: ‘Jonah became a sign to the people of Nineveh’ (Luke 11:30).  There’s some speculation over what he means by this, but I think it’s relatively simple.  If Jonah, with his forthright disobedience could be forgiven, the Ninevites could be as well!  Salvation would truly come from the Lord!  In his commentary on Jonah Hugh Martin speculates that Jonah must have shared ‘the terrible death which he endured, and the blessed resurrection which he experienced – can we doubt that the mercy and   miracle of their prophet’s resurrection was at once the ground and the gleam of hope which they caught hold of, as an encouragement to repent and call upon the Lord?’[2]  Through Jesus’ death and resurrection anyone who seeks forgiveness can receive it as the Ninevites did!

This brings us to the second point in relation to Jonah’s prayer, and that’s how we relate his prayer to his later anger which is directed at the Lords compassion and forgiveness of the Ninevites. And my word, he was angry!  Verse 1 of chapter 4 can be translated: ‘To Jonah it was a disaster, a great disaster. He became angry.’  The phrase: ‘He became angry’ in Hebrew is expressed by the word: ‘harah’ which can be translated as: ‘burning as with fire’ or: ‘was inflamed.’[3]  How can I put this?  The book just shouldn’t end this way with Jonah red faced and foaming at the mouth or jumping up and down in a frenzy of what may have been uncontrolled anger!  Now we know that in a way it doesn’t, God has the last word!  But the book is left hanging concerning Jonah’s attitude towards the Lord’s compassion for the Ninevites!  So how do we understand this?

Firstly, there’s a danger in the writing off Jonah completely. Anyone who is as angry as he is ends up saying things that they will regret later and we would do well to remember that in relation to what he had prayed earlier.  But I believe it highlights a weakness in Jonah’s theology.  He had not understood the extent of God’s grace.  He could understand it when it was extended to him; after all he was one of the Lord’s covenant people, but the Ninevites weren’t.  They didn’t ‘know their right hand from their left’ (4:11) which probably means they were not acquainted with God’s law as Jonah was.  The point was that God was prepared to extend his love and forgiveness to them despite their limited understanding due to their genuine repentance (see 3:6-9).  But Jonah had his theology as to who the Lord should save and whom he shouldn’t.  He figured the Lord shouldn’t relent where the Ninevites were concerned, hence his anger!  In chapter 4 verse 2 Jonah pretty much quotes Exodus 34: 6-7.  He properly thought it was a wonderful verse when applied to Israel.  He had no problem with the second part of verse 7 about God’s judgement upon the guilty: ‘to the third and fourth generation’ as the Ninevites were well-qualified as those who deserved punishment.  But we should be beware of a theology that imposes what we wish on God’s Word and leaves no room for God’s infinite grace, mercy and compassion.  That’s Jonah’s mistake here!  Such an attitude will only damage our relationship with God as it does when Jonah declares that he would rather die than go on living (vs3 and 8-9), which is effectively declaring “I don’t want to be the prophet of a God like you!”  Maybe, as I said, it was said in a fit of anger but we should note how much damage it does to the prophet’s relationship with God as at this point in the book he is reduced to disapproving and angry prayers!

The question for us is can we go through tough times and during them acknowledge God’s goodness to us, just as Jonah did in his prayer, and yet not really understand fully that the Lord may have been teaching us a poignant lesson about ourselves? Just because the Lord has been gracious to us in the past and we have seen his help, does not mean that he should always act as we think he should.  We can end up like Jonah, disapproving of God’s character and even starting to think he owes us something. We then end up as ‘rollercoaster Christians.’  We are going through a good time and experiencing the Lord’s blessing, God loves us!  But then we dive down into the depths of despair and depression.  There are family troubles (the worst kind), or we start to struggle with economic hardship through the loss of a job, or a much loved family member or relative dies.  The danger is that then we can forget the extent of God’s grace at a time we should be remembering it.  We decide God hates us, or even if we don’t use such a strong words, we believe he just doesn’t care!

Yet, if we looking for consistency, it is only found in God and his concern for those he has created. The characteristic of God that is shown in 4:2 and throughout the book of Jonah occurs again and again in the Old Testament![4]  That’s what we see in the book of Jonah, God is the only constant throughout!  Even Jonah acknowledges this and we should acknowledge it too and look to one who is consistent and a real foundation when we face times of trouble.  It may be hard, due to our sinfulness, but we are not to put conditions on God!  Jonah had prayed: ‘Those who pay regard to vain idols forsake their hope of steadfast love (2:8) but he had made an idol of his theology regarding Jews, Gentiles and sin!  He hadn’t learnt the right lessons from his experience.  The question for us is have we made, or are we in danger of making, idols of questionable personal beliefs about God that have little or nothing to with the Bible?  If so we need to repent and change.  Let’s pray that from this point on we are aware of, and avoid, Jonah’s mistake so it never becomes our mistake!

[1] Jesus references the: ‘sign of Jonah’ again to the Pharisees and Sadducees again in Matthew 16:1-4.

[2] Hugh Martin, Jonah, The Geneva Series of Commentaries, (London, The Banner of Truth Trust, 1870), 221-2.

[3]James Bruckner, The NIV Application Commentary, Jonah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, (Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 2004), 109.

[4] See Exodus 34:6-7, Nehemiah 9:17 b, Psalm 86:15: Psalm 103:12, Psalm 145:8 and Joel 2:13.

Prophet on the Run: Nineveh’s Response and the Lord’s Character: Jonah 3-4.

At the start of chapter 3 Jonah is given a second chance to carry out the Lord’s command.  This he does, and we get the gist of the message in verse 3.  The message is a simple message of judgment. This is not surprising when we consider that the Lord had commanded Jonah to go and preach in Nineveh because: ‘their evil has come up before me’  (1:2) and historically we know the atrocities that the Assyrian nation was capable of.  Yet there is a subtle difference here as the verb that is used for the word: ‘call’ infers that he is to preach ‘to’ the people of Nineveh rather than: ‘against’ them as in chapter 1.  It could be argued that this subtle change is in the light of Jonah’s experience in chapter 2.  But it is also possible it is to prepare the reader for a change of emphasis from the judgement of God to his compassion that we see at the end of this chapter and in chapter 4.[1]  Some commentators feel that Jonah must have shared with the Ninevites his judgment and deliverance by the hand of God, and this is not unlikely as we have almost certainly only been given a summary of his message.[2]  In this sense, as Jesus makes clear, Jonah acted as: ‘a sign to the people of Nineveh’ (Luke 11:30).  The point maybe that now Jonah should have a new understanding of the depths of God’s compassion and forgiveness when it comes to those who rebel against him and then repent, and this should be reflected in his preaching!

The proclamation of Jonah’s message is very thorough.  Some scholars have tried to make the case that the book of Jonah is a parable rather than an actual historical account.  One of the reasons given for this is the: ‘three days’ (v3) mentioned in relation to the city being improbable as archaeological discoveries do not suggest a city of that size.  However, it is more likely that Nineveh was made up of a large central city and the many towns and villages that surrounded it.  That being the case the indication is that Jonah’s proclamation soon spreads around the region reaching everyone whether that is by first-hand or by people passing it on to others.

However, whatever the case, the Ninevites believe his message and the equivalent of ‘revival’ breaks out with mass repentance.  But what caused such a reaction?  The answer is clearly spelt out in verse 5: ‘And the people of Nineveh believed God.’  There’s nothing to make us doubt that this was genuine repentance and belief as their attitude exhibits the ‘Ancient Near East’s’ culture of mourning!  Their repentance is summed up by the words of the King of Nineveh which illustrate the Ninevities acceptance of their sinful attitude.  The phrase: ‘Let everyone turn from his evil ways and from the violence that is in his hands’ (v8) being particularly appropriate to them as a nation!  There’s an understanding that they are completely dependent on God’s mercy as there is no reason why he should forgive them (v9).  The chapter ends with the Lord relenting from the disaster that he had threatened to bring upon them.

Jonah must be in the running as possibly the most successful prophet’s of the Old Testament era in terms of his message being believed and people repenting, so his anger might surprise us!  But his dodgy theology (which we will take a look at in the next part) does give us an opportunity to explore and understand the character of God.  In verse 2 of chapter 4 Jonah gives us the summary of Exodus 34:6-7: “The Lord, the Lord, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness,  keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.”  His summery of the Lord’s compassion is illustrated by the plant that God cause’s to grow and give him shade.  Much has been written about this, but essentially the lesson is very simple.  Jonah had benefited from the plant, but the point was the Lord had caused it to grow, not Jonah, so why was he so cut up about it when it died?  Likewise, if the Lord decided to spare Nineveh, then that was his business, not Jonah’s.  After all, it was his message that had caused them to repent not Jonah’s.  What he was doing now only illustrated his character and that being the case, Jonah really had no say in it as whether he approved or disapproved had no bearing on what the Lord did, or, as Jonah saw it, should do!

Yet in the unquestionable compassion and mercy of God there is a real sense that Jonah is as much a beneficiary as the Ninevites.  O. Palmer Robinson points out that in chapter 3 verses 1-2 it’s pretty much as if God says: “Let’s start from the first. – Let’s forget about the past and act as though it never happened.”[3]  If he has applied the same principle to the Ninevites then who was Jonah to question him as he too has been the beneficiary of this aspect of God’s nature?  The point, and it’s a very simple one, is that in God there is nothing remotely akin to our human temperament.  When true repentance is expressed, he, unlike us, feels no need to revisit the former misdemeanours of that person.  This is something that Jonah has only really understood on one level, and that is when it applied to him.

Secondly, it is worth noting that the phrase in verse 6: ‘the LORD God’.  This combination of the names of God (Yahweh, Elohim) is first found in reference to God placing Adam in the Garden of Eden.  ‘Yahweh’ is the covenant name for God whereas as ‘Elohim’ is a reference to his creative power.  So it demonstrates his special care for Adam by placing him in a special environment with the command that he is to serve God (the Hebrew verb illustrates this), as well as stipulations he is to follow and keep if he is to prosper (Genesis 2:15-17).  The use of this combination of names shows that the Lord will extend the same love and care towards Jonah, who has gone as far as to have to question the rightness of his actions towards the Ninevites!  The Ninevites had been ignorant of God’s Law, but repented, but Jonah, who could probably recite it perfectly, needed to be educated to understand that it was a reflection of God’s love and compassion.  So God continues to instruct Jonah despite his anger and stubbornness.

The book ends with the Lord questioning Jonah about the rightness of his compassion towards Nineveh.  We are left hanging as to how Jonah answered the question.  O. Palmer Robinson asks how we should answer it in the light of the Lord’s compassion towards us.  ‘Should not you have the compassion that reflects your Lord’s?  Considering how graciously he has had compassion on you and yours, should you not show the same compassion towards others?  Should not you have compassion even towards sinners that in some ways (but not in all ways) be worse than yourself?’[4]

Coming Soon: A Successful but very Bitter Prophet!   Another look at Jonah 3-4.

[1] T Desmond Alexander, Jonah (Leicester, Inter-Varsity Press, 1988). 118.  (As part of a commentary on Obadiah and Micah by David W.  Baker and Bruce K.  Waltke respectively).
[2] Hugh Martin, Jonah, The Geneva Series of Commentaries, (London, The Banner of Truth Trust, 1870), 221-2.
[3] O.  Palmer Robinson, Jonah, A Study in Compassion (Edinburgh, The Banner of Truth Trust, 1990), 41.
[4] Robinson, Jonah, 63-4.

The Letters to the Seven Churches: A Church that Tolerates Dangerous Teaching! Revelation 2:18-29.

“I know your works, your love and faith and service and patient endurance, and that your latter works exceed the first.  But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practise sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols”  (Revelation 2:19-20).

Every Church has them, or will come across them sooner or later.  I call them the ‘narrow band’.  What I mean by that is that they believe they are the few who have a unique knowledge that others have not got.  It may be to do with anything from Bible versions to some unique spiritual experience they claim to have had.  In the Church at Thyatira it manifested itself in a dangerous teacher and her followers!

Thyatira was a small prosperous city.  It had a temple dedicated to Apollo, the sun god which may account for Christ introducing himself as the: ‘Son of God’ (v18).  In many ways the Church was thriving as it was a loving Church and was showing real zeal by increasing its work.  No doubt if you went to a service there you would have been made to feel very welcome and probably you would have had several invites to dinner (v19)!  But Christ knows his Church and, as verse 18 shows, he sees all, and some of what he sees does not impress him!

Four times in my pastoral vocation I have been accredited.  Once by the ‘Fellowship of Independent Evangelical Churches’, then again with the ‘Evangelical Fellowship of  Congregational Churches’ and also by the two Churches I have served in as Pastor. Each time I have been independently recognised as being called to my role as a Pastor. However, the: ‘woman Jezebel’ had not!  She called: ‘herself a prophetess’ and others in the Church had just accepted her word for it (v20)!  I think it is unlikely that her name was Jezebel, but rather it gives an indication of the damage she was doing to the Church.  In the time of the Prophet Elijah Jezebel: ‘killed the prophets of the Lord’ (1Kings 18:13) as she was a worshipper of the detestable god Baal!  The reference in verse 24 to: ‘the deep things of Satan’ may mean this woman was teaching that Christians could be involved the pagan idol feasts.  Or that to know Satan secrets you had to indulge yourself in sinful practise, but your soul would remain untouched due to God’s grace.[1]  But whatever she was teaching she was bad news for the Church just as her Old Testament namesake was!

The rather strange reference to Christ’s feet being like burnished bronze (v18) is coupled with the words: ‘refined in the furnace’ in Chapter 1 verse 15.  A furnace melts down metal to rid it of all its impurities, so this is a reference to the purity and holiness of Christ.  This helps us understand why his judgment will be so severe on this woman and: ‘her children’ which is probably a reference to her followers.  Yet there is an indication of grace here as Christ has given her time to repent (v21).  There are various times in scripture where we see that God protects his Church in this way.  Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5:1-11 are a good example as is the situation in 1 Corinthians 11:29-30.   Perhaps it was more common in the Early Church for the Lord to keep it pure in this way, but we should not rule out that he can still do it today!  However we look at it, verses 22-23 acts as a warning for Churches to remain faithful to scripture and to test each ministry against it!

But there were some faithful Christians in Thyatira and Christ wants to do nothing but bless them!  Those who are faithful are to: ‘hold fast’ as this blessing is not unwarranted.  But what a blessing it is as they will rule with Christ and have a share in Christ: ‘the morning star’ (v28 and 20:16).  There is a lesson here to check every ministry against the scripture as we are told: ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the Churches’ (v29).  After all the Word of God is the ‘sword of the Spirit’  (Ephesians 6:17) and therefore greater than self appointed human authority!

Would you like to hear a sermon on this passage?  A Church that Tolerates Dangerous Teaching!

[1] Steve Wilmshurst, The Final Word, The Book of Revelation Simply Explained (Darlington, Evangelical Press, 2008) 44.

Prophet on the Run: Salvation comes from the Lord! Jonah 2.

As Jonah was being tossed about by the waves perhaps he was thinking “It’s bad enough being asked to go to Nineveh, but now I’m about to drown!” But, at this point, God steps in!  In verse 17 of chapter 1 we read: ‘And the LORD appointed a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was inside the belly of the fish three days and three nights.’  It’s here, inside the fish, that Jonah’s heart and mind turned to the Lord in prayer because at that point he has a startling moment of clarity (v1)!

Jonah had been running away from the Lord, but now he realises that everything that has happened to him was under the Lord’s control. His prayer is in the form of a Psalm.  His situation is desperate so he cries out to the Lord.  When this occurred may not be a 100% clear at first, but my gut feeling is it was when he was thrown into the sea as we have no indication of him praying before that.  But it’s when he’s found out (1:7) he starts to clarify the situation as seen by his statement in chapter 1 verse 9.  The sailors had no problem accepting his guilt because they could see the evidence for themselves as their comment in verse 10 of chapter 1 could be phrased: “Are you crazy?”[1]  Jonah’s command to pick him up and throw him into the sea probably shows that he realised all that was happing was the Lord’s doing and the Lord controlled his destiny from the moment he had started running away!  Therefore Jonah, now thinking in a logical theological fashion, cries out to the only one who can do anything about his situation (v2).  But there is an aspect in verse 2 which is rather interesting, and that is how Jonah equates his experience with death.  Jonah equates Sheol as separation from the Lord.  But now there’s good news; the Lord has heard him!  As John Calvin puts it: ‘Jonah, as we shall hereafter see, directed his prayers to God not without great struggle; he contended with many difficulties; but however great the impediments in his way, he still preserved and ceased not from praying.’[2]  This is encouragement when we face mounting troubles; we pray to the Lord as there is no place that we can be physically or spiritually separated from God’s love and care!

Verse 3 emphasises Jonah’s new found understanding of God’s sovereignty with the phrase: ‘For you cast me into the deep, into the heart of the seas,’ and: ‘all your waves and billows passed over me.’  In Jonah’s mind, the sailors were instruments of God judgement upon him.  This understanding of God’s sovereignty over land and sea was first acknowledged in Jonah’s confession to the sailors that he was the cause of their trouble (1:9).  Yet, at this point in Jonah’s experience, this aspect of God’s sovereignty truly terrifies him as he realises he is suffering the Lord’s righteous judgement and seems been excluded from the Lord’s presence (v4).  Today we properly can’t understand how important the temple was in Jewish thinking, but, to the Jew, the Temple was the very place where God connected with his people and Heaven and Earth, in effect, met (1 Chronicles 28:2).  Verse 4 gives us an indication of this as he will be able to look again to the Lord’s: ‘holy temple.’ and that makes all the difference for him in his present situation.  He gives a vivid description of downing in verse 5 and the picture we get in verse 6 is him being dragged into the deepest depths with the air in his lungs almost gone.  The language is interesting as it gives a picture of Jonah being in an impregnable prison.  Lloyd Oglivie notes that: ‘It was believed that the world of the dead had an imprisoning door that once close behind a person there could be no extraction. Jonah went down for the third time and gave up.  The grave of the sea had him, or so he thought.’[3]  But this was not the case as the sea was at God’s command.  Jonah had cried out to the Lord and now he acknowledges that the Lord: ‘brought up my life from the pit’ (v6).  The word: ‘pit’ within the context of Jonah prayer could be rendered ‘Sheol’.  But as David reminds us in Psalm 139:8: ‘If I ascend to heaven, you are there! If I make my bed in Sheol, you are there!’  As Gordon Keddie notes: ‘Even in Sheol- the grave – the Lord is with his people!’[4]  Jonah’s sin had taken him far from the Lord, but the Lord reached out to him!  We might find ourselves in similar circumstances; due to our disobedience.  But like Jonah, we should know that the prayer of repentance is not limited by the distance we have put between ourselves and God.  Despite that distance, God is never deaf to the cry of a repentant sinner!Verse 7 now gives us the exact point when Jonah’s thoughts turned to God. It was when his: ‘life was ebbing away’. He may have been praying beforehand, but these were probably angry prayers the sort that would have been asking “why must I to go to Nineveh?”  Or, as he was thrown into the sea, “what have I done to deserve this?”  Or, as he was swallowed by the fish, “Lord, could you possibly make this worse?”  We shouldn’t expect answers to angry prayers (although sometimes God is incredibly gracious, as we see in chapter 4)!  But Jonah’s tone has changed.  Despite God’s judgement being the cause of his suffering, I’m guessing he remembered God’s wonderful nature which is seen so clearly in chapter 4 verse 2 that the Lord is: ‘a gracious God and merciful, slow to anger and abounding steadfast love, and relenting from disaster’ (echoing Exodus 34:6-7).   Despite Jonah saying this with disapproval there, it makes the difference here.  Jonah stops being angry and prays a prayer that can reach God and is answered.  The illustration of his prayer rising to God’s temple may refer to the custom the Jews had where they turned towards the temple when in prayer.  As Calvin puts it ‘Jonah says that his prayer entered into the temple of God; for that was a visible symbol, through which the Jews might understand that God was near to them.’[5]  Jonah has got his perspective right as his focus is now on God.  This is remedy for us when a situation starts to overwhelm us.  Stop looking at the situation and focus on God, then we will start to get the right perspective!

Verses 8-9 act as a conclusion to the Prayer. Jonah thinks of the sailors and their fruitless prayers.  Jonah’s experience had proved that their idols were: ‘worthless’ and could provide no help whatsoever.  Help had come when Jonah was thrown into the sea and strangely, both he and the sailors saw the Lord’s grace.  The sailors in that God stilled the storm, and Jonah in that God had provided the fish.  At that point the sailors were a good example of people without God.  Whatever people use to shape their life if is not God then they will forfeit grace.  Rather interestingly, the word for ‘idols’ literally means ‘snare’.[6]  Jonah ends his Psalm with a statement of intent; he will praise and thank God (v9).  What is meant by him sacrificing to God is not altogether clear.  It could mean Jonah will make a sacrifice when circumstances allow, which, interestingly enough, is the response of the sailors (1:16).  Jonah’s concern is that salvation is the property of the Lord as no one else can impart it.  Jonah’s and the sailor’s recent experience stands as testament to this as neither party could have saved themselves.  Only God and his supernatural agencies can do that!

To be continued…..!

[1] James Bruckner, The NIV Application Commentary, Jonah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, (Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 2004), 45.

[2] John Calvin, Jonah, Micah and Nahum, A Commentary on the Twelve Minor Prophets, Volume 3, The Geneva Series of Commentaries, (Edinburgh, the Banner of Truth Trust, 1986) 76.

[3] Lloyd J. Oglivie, The Preachers Commentary, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Old Testament Volume 22, (Nashville, Thomas Nelson, 1990) 433.

[4] Gordon J. Keddie, Preacher on the Run, The Message of Jonah, Welwyn Commentary Series, (Darlington, Evangelical Press, 1986), 58.

[5]  Calvin, Jonah, 85.

[6] T. Desmond Alexander, Jonah (with David W. Baker {Obadiah} and Bruce K.Waltke {Micah}), Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, (Leicester, Inter-Varsity Press, 1988), 117.

You can Run but You can’t Hide! Jonah: The Background and First Chapter

 ‘It’s going to get worse, before it gets better’ is a phrase that Jonah would have probably nodded his head ruefully in agreement with as he would undoubtedly testify to the truth of that statement!  We very often think of the book of Jonah as the stuff children’s talks are made of, an absolute gift from heaven for the speaker to do their stuff and provide vivid and exciting illustrations!  After all, isn’t that the book that has all that stuff about the prophet being swallowed by a whale?  The problem with that kind of thinking is it really misses the point of the book.  Besides that, the Hebrew renders our precious whale as a ‘big fish’ ‘or sea monster.’  And I’m not going to get into debates over what the fish was anyway as to do so is to miss the point of what the book teaches![1]  Jonah has much more to teach us other than that!

Put yourself in Jonah’s shoes. You’re a successful and popular prophet, and believe you me that wasn’t usually the case where most prophets were concerned!  After all, you’ve made a prophecy that has come to pass and more to the point it was a good prophecy not one of those ones about war, famine and pestilence due to covenant curses (Deuteronomy 28:15-68) which was the usual run of things where the rebellious people of Israel were concerned.  Jonah’s only other mention in the Old Testament is as a prophet to the northern kingdom around about 793-753 BC and is concerning this prophecy.  The interesting thing is that when he makes his prophecy King Jeroboam the second is on the throne and he, to be honest, was a lousy King!  Yet it is at this time that the word of the Lord comes to Jonah concerning Jeroboam’s actions in restoring large areas of land to Israel.  Despite being a thoroughly wicked King this was: ‘according to the word of the LORD, the God of Israel, which he spoke by his servant Jonah son of Amittai, the prophet who was from Gath-helper’ (2 Kings 14:25).  Now let’s face it, that’s the kind of prophecy that people want to hear especially as it hasn’t required any great change in their devotion, or more to the point, their lack of it, to the Lord!  So before we encounter him here, Jonah is that unusual thing for a prophet, the flavour of the month or year in this case due to his prophecy.

But just when Jonah starts to think “I could get used to this” or “being a prophet isn’t as bad as it’s made out to be” his next assignment from the Lord is, to put it mildly, not as crowd-pleasing and certainly wasn’t going to make Jonah flavour of the month with the people who the prophecy concerns. We read in 1:1-2: ‘Now the word of the LORD came to Jonah the son of Amittai, saying, “Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city and call out against it, for their evil has come up before me.”’ Nineveh![2] How Jonah’s spirits must have sunk when he heard the location for his next prophecy.  These were Israel’s enemies (and just about everyone else’s) who were making life a misery for the surrounding nations.  Their atrocities that they carried out on those they captured would probably turn the stomach of those who produce R rated movies or photographers hardened by working in war zones!  I suppose the closest we could get to Jonah’s situation today would be a missionary receiving a call from the Lord to go to downtown Tehran in Iran and preach the Gospel there.  Surely no one in their right mind would go!  But there’s one major hitch where Jonah is concerned, the Lord has commanded him to go!

But Jonah is having none of it and promptly takes a ship heading in the other direction towards Spain! However, he has temporarily forgotten one thing.  The Lord is sovereign over all of creation, not just the nation of Israel.  To quote boxer Joe Louis: ‘you can run but you can’t hide’,  so if Jonah thinks one reluctant prophet can escape the Lord he’s got another thing coming!  The Lord sends a storm that is so bad that the pagan sailors turn to their gods in prayer and in a panic throw the cargo into the sea.  Jonah, in the meantime, having thought he’d given the Lord the slip and more than comfortable with his actions decides to take 40 winks down below until a panicking Captain comes down to wake him up and alert him to the danger that they face.  In desperation the sailors turn to casting lots and the lot falls on Jonah.  Finally Jonah owns up realising he can run but he can’t hide where God is concerned and, from what we can gather in chapter 1 verses 9-10, confesses to the sailors who he is and what he has done.  Not surprisingly this terrifies the sailors because they can see the proof of it all around them, so they ask him what they are to do.  Jonah tells them there is only one thing they can do and that is throw him into the sea as it’s his fault that the storm has come upon them and he basically thinks drowning is a lot better than going and preaching to Israel’s enemies.  Instead, showing a lot more consideration than he had shown them they try to row back to land, but the storm is so severe it gets them nowhere.  In the end they reluctantly do as Jonah has said, pleading with the Lord not to hold it against them (after all they are probably reasoning if the Lord is mad at his prophet for running away from him he might be even madder with them if they drown him by throwing him into the sea).  The storm ceases and ironically Jonah’s success as a prophet continues as the sailors turn to the Lord and offer sacrifices to him and, more significantly, make a vows to him (1:16).  But the Lord has provided for Jonah in a most surprising way!

And the Lord appointed a great fish to swallow up Jonah.  And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights (v17).

To be continued….

[1] In my opinion speculation and about the kind of fish involved and if it is scientifically possible is a waste of time!   Although it is possible that a large sperm whale could swallow a man there would have to be an element of the miraculous for a man to survive three days and three nights as Jonah did.  But that shouldn’t be a problem when we believe in a God can do the miraculous!  As Wiersbe notes: ‘It was a “prepared” fish” (1:17) ‘designed by God for the occasion, and therefore quite adequate for the task.’ Warren W. Wiersbe, Be Amazed, Restoring an Attitude of Wonder and Worship, (Illinois, Victor Books, 1996) 81.

[2]‘A principle city, and the last capital of Assyria.’ J. D. Douglas, Editor, The illustrated Bible dictionary, part 2, Goliath – Papyri, (Leicester, Inter-Varsity-Press, 1980), 1089.

The Letters to the Seven Churches: A Church that Tolerates False Teaching! Revelation 2:12-17

“I know where you dwell, where Satan’s throne is. Yet you hold fast my name, and you did not deny my faith even in the days of Antipas my faithful witness, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells” (Revelation 2:13).

Pergamum was the capital of the Roman Province we now call Asia Minor. It was the centre of Empire, and had a temple dedicated to Aesculapius, the god of healing – represented by a snake – which may account for the phrase: ‘where Satan’s throne is’ (verse 13). Therefore, the situation would have been very difficult for the Church there – as Christians were viewed with suspicion, for not submitting to the Emperor.  So, how does Christ address them?

The imagery of Jesus, ‘walking among the lampstands’, representing the Churches (1:20), tells us that the Lord knows all about them. He knows that things have been tough, but they have remained faithful, even during intense opposition (v2).[1]  Yet, if they had been uncompromising in the past, some of them had done a 180 turn and gone to the other extreme!  But, what exactly were they doing wrong?

For that, we need to take a trip back to the days of the Exodus. In Numbers, chapter 22-24 we meet Balaam.  Balak, the King of Moab, was terrified that his kingdom would be overrun by the people of Israel.  So, doing what you did in those days, he calls a prophet who, for a price, will curse them!  Balaam obviously has a nice little side-line in doing this, but insists that he can only do so if God permits it.  A memorable adventure with his ass follows, but Balaam disappoints Balak as he ends up blessing Israel!  However, the story does not end there – Balaam wants it both ways.  He wants his promised wage packet, so he finds another way, by encouraging the Moabite women to lure the men of Israel into sexual immorality (Numbers 31:16).  He comes to a bad end (Numbers 31:8) and is sadly summed up as one ‘who loved to gain from wrongdoing’ (2 Peter 2:15).

So the Church was compromising. Like Balaam, they acted as if they were faithful to God.  Yet in other areas they were anything but!  Most likely some in the Church were saying they could be part of the city’s trade guilds, each of which had its own god and would have had meals where some of the food was sacrifice to an idol.  No doubt these feasts would have also encouraged immorality.  Yet to get on in their particular jobs some Christians were convinced they could both serve God and participate in pagan revelry (v14)!  If that was not bad enough, some of them were following the teaching of the dreaded Nicolatians.[2]

But Christ was having none of it! The two-edged sword John referred to in 1:16 is mentioned twice in this passage.  In Hebrews 4:12-13 that metaphor is used to show the truth and the power of the Word of God.  Quite simply Christ implies the message of the Gospel will cut the arguments of those guilty of this sin to pieces!  The Church needed to repent for allowing this false teaching, which some had embraced (note: ‘them’ in v16), to have compromised the Church.

Nonetheless, Christ wants to bless his Church, with two promises: The ‘hidden manna’ probably refers to the manna that was kept in a jar during the Exodus – to remind future generations of God’s goodness to them (Exodus 16:33). This is later fulfilled in Christ in John 6:51 when Jesus says: ‘I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread he will live for ever’.  There are several possibilities as to what the ‘white stone’ symbolises.  But one idea that appears most relevant here and makes most sense is the idea of the 12 stones that were on the breast plate of the high priest that had the names of the 12 tribes on them.  This stone would have their: ‘new name’ on it, ensuring their inclusion among God’s people.  Their future is assured, if they continue to be faithful by staying true to the Word of God.  What a great incentive this is for us today not to compromise whatever the temptation!

Want to listen to a sermon on this passage?  A Church that Tolerates False Teaching!

[1] Who was Antipas?  Some commentators have linked him to various martyrs, but to be honest we just don’t know.  It’s likely that he was a leader in the Church who had been faithful in the face of major opposition.

[2] The Nicolatians are mention here again, but Balaam may give us an indication about what they taught.  The name Balaam means: ‘lord of the people’ and the word Nicolatians means: ‘to rule the people’ which suggests they could have been teaching some form of legalism which led to a ‘cast iron’ control of people.  Warren Wiersbe, Be Victorious (Wheaton, SP Publications, 1985) 30.

Expectation based on Experience!

Psalm 3

Background to the Psalm:

Back in what was is often referred to as the ‘Golden age of Hollywood’ the English actor David Niven shared a house with Errol Flynn.  His summing up of Flynn’s nature was interesting to say the least.  “You can count on Errol Flynn; he’ll always let you down.”  No doubt that was based on Niven’s experience of living with Flynn as over time and by observing a person’s nature we gradually get an idea of what to expect, or in Niven’s case, what not to expect.  When we read this Psalm based on David’s experience when his son Absalom rebelled against him we get a very clear idea of what David expects from the Lord when he turns to him in prayer.  But here, rather than the fickle nature of a notorious Hollywood star, we see David’s expectation is based on the steadfast and faithful nature of  God’s character.

Before we look at the text of the psalm we need to understand the events leading up to the writing of it. David’s reign had been an unqualified success. Yet just when he should have been continuing to take care of business he’d let himself become idle and open to temptation! This resulted in his adultery with Bathsheba. The sorry story of deceit and murder and God’s judgment can be found in 2 Samuel 11-12 but the upshot was that although David had been forgiven, there were going to be consequences (2 Samuel12:11). This starts with the death of the son born to him and Bathsheba! The next few chapters reveal what else this judgment entails. David’s family is a mess and the rape of David’s daughter Tamar by her brother Ammon and his subsequent murder by her brother Absalom, David’s favourite son, is just the beginning of David’s woes (2 Samuel 13:1-33). To cut a long story short, after a time of exile Absalom comes back to Jerusalem and, knowing how to win friends and influence people, he plans a rebellion (2 Samuel 15:12-13).

David is now fleeing Jerusalem as: “The hearts of the men of Israel had gone after Absalom” (2 Samuel 15:13). Absalom has all but declared himself King and the brightest and best of David’s counsellors have allied themselves with him! Unsurprisingly we are told that: ‘David went up the ascent to the Mount of Olives, weeping as he went, barefoot and with his head covered’ (2 Samuel 15:30).

 The structure of the Psalm:

  • David is in a desperate situation (vs1-2) but things are not what they seem (v3-4).
  • David has complete confidence in the LORD and so has a real sense of peace (vs5-6).
  • David calls on the LORD to act (v7).
  • David makes a statement which contrasts with the statement of others made in verse 1.

Some obviations on the text (all quotations ESV):

The situation looks desperate. David notes: ‘Many are rising against me’ (v1). His wisest counsellor Ahithophel, whose council was: ‘as if one consulted the word of God’ (2 Samuel 16:23), has joined Absalom’s rebellion. The situation looked at the best very difficult and at the worst impossible! Indeed, verse 2 shows this sentiment was shared by many people. The language is interesting as the name for God here is ‘Elohim’, meaning ‘Creator’ rather than ‘Yahweh’ God’s covenant name.[1] These people were alluding to God deserting David and maybe he was thinking of the words of Shimei a relation of Saul’s who cursed him and his family and men as they fled with the words: “Get out, get out, you man of blood, you worthless man! The LORD has avenged on you all the blood of the house of Saul, in whose place you have reigned, and the LORD has given the kingdom into the hand of your son Absalom” (2 Samuel 16:7-8). In short, people were saying David was finished!

Rather interestingly this is not the attitude David takes. The Lord had preserved David in past. David may have been the Lord’s anointed one, but Saul had different ideas and had spent considerable time and energy trying to kill him! Why hadn’t he succeeded? Because the Lord had protected David due to the promises he made to him concerning his future (2 Samuel 7:4-17). What is clear as the Psalm proceeds is that David trusted these promises. To David God was ‘Yahweh’ (that is the word used in verse 1 when David is writing in the first person), the covenant God, who keeps his promises!

Bishop George Horne up observers that: ‘Affliction and desertion are two very different things, often confounded by the world.’ He then continues noting that: ‘The fearful imaginings of our own desponding hearts, and the suggestions of our crafty adversary, frequently joins to help forward this most dangerous temptation, in the hour of sorrow.’[2] In times of trouble we can so easily become immersed in the situation that we do not find the ability to step back and view the situation as David does. But that is what we are encouraged to do. For the first time in the book the word: ‘Selah’ is used. But what does it mean? It has been suggested that use of the word: ‘Selah’ was used to emphasize a point in the Psalm where there was an interlude of some kind so that: ‘the singer or reader of the Psalm in order that the statement last made or the thought as a whole just developed may be reflected upon before the next turn of thought appears.[3] So at this point we are to take a step back and consider David’s situation. He will invite us to do this twice more as his prayer develops.

David understood the Lord’s character, the promises he had made and how that they related to him now he was King. So rather than driving him away, his problem drive him towards God. David’s description of the Lord is as: ‘a shield about me’ (v3). He looks to the Lord in prayer as he is the perfect place to look for protection. But the second part of the verse makes it clear that the Lord is not just protecting David, he is validating him. The gossip was that: ‘there is no salvation for him in God’ (v2), but to David he is: ‘my glory, and the lifter of my head.’ This verse and the verses that follow clearly demonstrate that David understood the Lords relationship with him as a believer as in verse 4 he expects and sees his prayer being answered by the Lord.

David had insisted that the Ark of the Covenant be sent back to the city (2 Samuel 15:25). Yet, despite knowing that God was still with him, there’s a sense that David saw the Ark as symbolizing God’s throne (2 Samuel 6:2), so now he looks to his: ‘holy hill’ (v4) remembering God’s kingship and sovereignty over the situation that he’s in. Absalom might think he controlled the situation, but that was not the case. These attributes of God expressed here are so real to David that he sees his prayer as being as good as answered! Having expressed his confidence in God David once again injects the word: ‘Selah’ as an invitation to the worshipers and the readers of the Psalm to again pause and reflect on what he has just written in relation to what others were saying (see vs1-2).

Such is David’s confidence in the Lord that when we get to verse 5 we see that he is capable of getting a good night’s sleep because now his mind is completely settled. He feels a great sense of security, so he can get up to face a new day because the Lord is sustaining him. A great many were on Absalom’s side (2 Samuel 15:13). But David is not afraid of these: ‘many thousands of people who have set themselves against me’ (v6). Why? It is not because he’s particularly brave or he can think his way out of the situation, but because he has left it in the Lord’s hands. The Lord is far more capable of handling what looks like an impossible situation than David or those who are loyal to him. The Lord’s presence and faithfulness in this situation nullifies any threat of the enemy. That is the answer to the taunts and the threats that were being made against David in verse 1-2 of the Psalm.

The last section starts with a note of triumph. David’s cry of: ‘Arise, O LORD! Save me, O my God!’ (v7) has been compared to a battle cry. In the book of Numbers 10:33-36, whenever Israel broke camp and the Ark of the Covenant was moved: ‘Moses said “arise, O LORD, and let your enemies be scattered, let those who hate you flee before you”’ (Numbers 10:35). As the Ark was symbolically God’s throne, the start of verse 7 can be seen as a call: ‘for God to arise, as from his throne or judgment seat’.[4] As David is in a situation where he’s fighting for his throne and his life, such conclusion seems very likely. After all, the enemies of the Lord’s people are his enemies! Some commentators see the second part of verse 7 as being the equivalent of breaking the teeth of wild animal and rendering it harmless. But I think it’s more likely David is calling upon the Lord to not so much act against the enemy, but to take action: ‘against the evil which they speak and do.’[5] Therefore, what I believe this imagery conveys is that the statements of those in verse 2 are worthless to such an extent that they deserve to be insulted and ridiculed.

The last verse of the Psalm makes it clear that David is not looking for a pragmatic or self-made solution to his problem; the solution must come from God. The word: ‘salvation’ bookends the Psalm, in that it was used in a negative sense concerning David in the introduction to the Psalm, but now it’s used in a positive sense where believers are concerned.

Would you like to listen to a sermon on this Psalm?  Expectation based on Experience!

[1] J.J. Stewart Perowne, The Book of Psalms, (Grand Rapids, Zondervan, 1976), 123.

[2] Bishop George Horne, A Commentary on the Book of Psalms, Volume 1, (London, William Baynes, 1812), 65.

[3] H. C. Leupold, Exposition of the Psalms, (London, Evangelical Press, 1959), 61.

[4] Craig C. Broyles, New International Biblical Commentary Psalms, (Massachusetts, Hendrickson publishers, Inc, 1999), 50.

[5] Peter C. Craigie, Word Biblical Commentary 19, Psalms 1-50, (Waco, Word Books Publisher 1983), 75.